http://michaelflanakin.com/Forums/tabid/211/forumid/25/scope/threads/Default.aspx2010-09-10T11:53:08Z2007-01-27T21:55:15Z1202007-01-27T19:35:18Zflanakinmhttp://michaelflanakin.com/Forums/tabid/211/forumid/25/threadid/35/scope/posts/Default.aspxWelcome to the <A HREF="/Articles/Comparisons/WebBasedIssueTrackers/tabid/198/Default.aspx">issue tracker comparison</A>&nbsp;discussion forum. My hopes are that having this forum will allow people to discuss the trackers openly in an environment more inducive to collaboration. Hope it works out well!2007-01-27T21:55:15Zflanakinmhttp://michaelflanakin.com/Forums/tabid/211/forumid/25/threadid/36/scope/posts/Default.aspxAs you've seen on the&nbsp;issue tracker list, there are a number of tools that haven't been updated in a few years. I'm wondering when the right time is to "retire" these. Any thoughts? Usage definitely comes into play, but I'm thinking three years. The only reason I hesitate with this is because of Nant, which is a vastly popular tool for .NET that wasn't updated for probably two years. I'll probably start with those four or five years old and more. Anybody else have ideas on this?